Speaking and Listening CA

In today's CA, we went through the three major points and our arguments were quite structured. We were quite alert and ensured that the conversation moves on, instead on going in circles (which we did yesterday).

I was quite sure about which part of the press conference I should jump in and question the other characters. I felt that my role and the detective's role were more about ensuring that the conversation moves on. My role as a reporter mainly questions and challenges all the characters, especially Victor and the professor to defy and contradict what they said. My questions also acts as prompts for other characters to speak their minds. 

After watching our performance, I think that on the whole, all of us played quite a convincing role throughout the whole CA. Though this was mainly based on on-the-spot improvisation, we stayed in character and presented our views in the perspectives of the character that we played.

What we could have improved on was perhaps increase the fury and hatred all the others have on Victor and his creature. Basically, the peasant and the reverend would be furious and appalled by what has Victor created and what has the creature done while the professor and Henry would be busy defending his dearest friend. A clash of opinion did occur but this can be improved. 

Speaking and Listening CA Practice: Reflection!

We got together and planned out the format that we would present our CA in. We decided to do a press conference which has a trial feel to it. We went through the major points and have decided that we are going to talk about these topics:

1. Science and Religion
2. Damaged properties
3. Parental responsibility

As a reporter, I feel that I should grab and jump in at any opportunity I have to nail Frankenstein and his monster just like any pesky reporter. I want to approach my role like Rita Skeeter which I find very interesting. She digs out juicy information and satiate the hunger of her readers through publishing it in Daily Prophet. 

Reflection: Listening and Speaking CA

Think about your personal targets (reflecting on your last performance) and create an entry in your learning blog to record these and how you intend to achieve them.


Targets and how I achieve that:
1. To be more expressive during role play by moving around,
2. To slow down when speaking so that I can utilise pauses for dramatic effect.
3. To be more convincing by staying in character.

How Shelley uses language to create an atmosphere of gothic horror?

Shelley uses strong imagery to create an atmosphere of gothic horror. She started off the chapter with ‘… a dreary night of November’. This gives the impression to readers that Frankenstein has been working on his experiment for a very long time and he is starting to get tired of it. ‘November’ is when the long and cold winter starts and can be related to death as some plants, which are unable to stand the cold, wither and die, while some animals hibernate. Her liberal use of descriptive words like ‘dun white sockets’ and ‘shrivelled complexion’ creates and gives the impression to readers that the monster instils fear in everyone who sees him.

The fact that she made Frankenstein, the creator, actually afraid and horrified at his creation seem to further creates a strategic atmosphere of horror. Frankenstein’s horror can be clearly seen through the line ‘… walking up and down in greatest agitation, listening attentively, catching and fearing each sound…’. Frankenstein is very ashamed of the creature that he has created and unlike any new proud parent, Frankenstein despises the creature that he has created. This can be seen through Frankenstein’s referral to his creation as a ‘catastrophe’, ‘wretch’, ‘creature’, ‘accident’ ‘it’, ‘inanimate body’ and ‘daemonical corpse’. Even the creator himself is afraid of his creation, shouldn’t we the readers be more shocked and horrified at the creature?

Besides that, she also uses pathetic fallacy like ‘dreary night’ and ‘dim and yellow night of the moon’ to set the atmosphere of the story. Right at the beginning, personification is fused together with pathetic fallacy ‘the rain pattered dismally against the panes, and my candle was nearly burnt out’ to set the eerie atmosphere of the story. This is rather an ingenious way of setting the atmosphere without the readers directly knowing it. With pathetic fallacy, readers are brought on an emotional rollercoaster ride ‘by the glimmer of the half-extinguished light, I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open’. Shelley effectively uses pathetic fallacy to create that eerie atmosphere during the ‘birth’ of the creation.

Shelley also uses contrast in the second paragraph to highlight and shed a horrific light on the creature. The sharp contrast between ‘beautiful’, ‘lustrous black, and flowing’ and ‘his teeth of a pearly whiteness’ and ‘watery eyes’, ‘dun white sockets’, ‘shrivelled complexion’ and ‘straight black lips’ injects a feeling of freakiness into readers. At first the creature is described to be perfect and divine, but Shelley used the first impression Frankenstein gave us for his creature to further contrast how horrific his creature looks like. To me, this way of describing the creature in this manner has a much more profound impact on readers, particularly on readers back then where it was unheard of for the dead to come back to life. Contrast is also used when describing Frankenstein’s feelings before and after creating his creature. ‘I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I finished, the beauty of the dream vanished’. This tells readers that even Frankenstein himself is disgusted and horrified at what he created.

Furthermore, Shelley also used allusion to aid her create an atmosphere of horror. For example, ‘it became a thing such as even Dante could not have conceived’. Back then during Shelley’s period, Dante was also another gothic horror novel author. Readers back then would know that Dante was the author to ‘The Divine Comedy’ and Shelley was using this to depict the creature being worse than Hell itself. This is more effective and has a better impact on readers back then compared to the readers today because they are more familiar with Dante.

In conclusion, Shelley has effectively used a variety of techniques ranging from imagery, contrast, allusion and pathetic fallacy to aid her in setting an atmosphere of gothic horror in Frankenstein.

Chapter 4: Horror and childbirth.

Close focus on the end of chapter 4. How does Shelley create an atmosphere of horror and dread around Victor’s experiments? Note also words from the semantic field of birth (‘conceive’, ‘labour’, ‘bore’) – why might Shelley use them?


Shelley creates an atmosphere of dread and horror around Victor's experiment by providing a very descriptive, detailed insight to his experiments. 'Who shall conceive the horrors of my secret toil, as ... the grave, ... tortured the living animal to animate the lifeless clay?' shows the horrific methods in which Victor undertook to obtain different 'parts' for his monster. Her vivid description of the organs 'my eye balls were starting from their sockets in attending to the details of my employment' is also a technique to instill horror. The names she created for Victor's various rooms, such as 'dissecting room' and 'slaughterhouse' have the ability to send chills down one's bones by itself. This has a visual impact on readers and as it registers in readers' mind, readers feel disgusted and horrified at Victor's methods of obtaining 'parts' for his monster.


Besides that, Shelley made Victor into a character who is intently obsessed about his experiments. Words like 'unremitting ardour' and 'lost all soul or sensation but for this one pursuit' shows that Victor's obsession in his work is very intent to the extent that 'my cheek had grown pale with study, and my person had become emaciated with confinement'. It is hinted that Shelley thinks that Victor's obsession is unhealthy. Shelley describes Victor into a character that is trapped with his experiments. Besides the fact that Victor could not 'tear my thought from my employment ... swallowed up every habit of my nature', his passion and nature was so intense that he 'pursued nature to her hiding-places'. He shuts himself away in his 'cell' and alienates himself from his family and friends.

Shelley also uses words from the semantic field of birth because she likens the creation of Frankenstein's monster like a nine-month gestation period. 'Winter, spring, and summer' passes, Victor's 'enthusiasm was checked by my anxiety' and he was rather anxious for his creation to be finally completed. Perhaps Shelley wanted to pen down the anxiety and apprehension that soon-to-be mothers go through as she herself, though at a young age of 18, has already been through two pregnancies. She wanted to tell her readers the fear that women go through during the gestation period.

Everyone dies.

Again. Othello and Desdemona dies. Just like Romeo and Juliet. And it's all about timing.

If only Desdemona frankly told Othello about her handkerchief. If only Othello pressed Iago for concrete evidence about Desdemona and Cassio's affair. If only Roderigo had been a little smarter. If only Cassio had noticed Othello's increasing dislike towards him.

Iago, Othello and Cassio.

Iago made Othello, Cassio and Roderigo look like complete idiots. Roderigo was killed by Iago after his unsuccessful attempt to kill Cassio to destroy evidence against him. After Othello smothered Desdemona in her bedsheets (very dramatic indeed), he kills himself after discovering that it was all Iago's deeds which led him to believe all that slander about Desdemona and Cassio. But who would expect that it was the soft-spoken Emilia, wife to Iago to save the day when she shed light on Iago's horrible plans and schemes. She became a martyr of feminism as even after Iago told her to 'shut up', she connected the dots and revealed that it was all a part of Iago's plans. Iago then stabs her for revealing too much.

Othello commits suicide.

Othello, poor Othello. At first, Othello was such a noble, brave, loving, confident and seemingly perfect general. Eventhough he was about to wed and consummate his marriage with Desdemona, he was willing to postpone it until after the war in Cyprus. He also reassures everyone that he will not be blinded by love and instead ensure a victorious battle against the Turks. But throughout the story, his character develops in such a way that all in all, it is revealed that Othello is mortal. He is a human and he is not perfect. He has his own flaws and with Iago's insinuation, he fell deeper and deeper into the little trap set by Iago. It was not wars, neither mortal injuries nor diseases which led of the downfall of a capable general; but it was jealousy which brought Othello to his knees (and his deathbed).

Desdemona strangled by Othello.

Desdemona has my heartfelt pity. Of all the emotional and physical abuse that Othello had showered on her, it was until before her tragic death she knew the reason behind all that treatment. She was smothered for something she know not of, and something that she did not do. It was slanders and jealously that killed divine Desdemona. The little speech she gave before she died revealed how much she loved Othello for she blamed no one but herself for her tragic death.

Iago

But I was very disappointed when Iago refused to speak anymore when all his evil schemes were discovered. After going through all Iago's meticulous plans to eliminate Cassio and Othello, I am still in the dark as to Iago's real motives. All the conversations Iago had with the audience, its credibility can be doubted as his manipulative nature is evident. He might have been manipulating, us, audience all along the play too. Why did he want to destroy the Moor? He hated Othello because he promoted Cassio instead of himself as a lieutenant. He felt that it was unfair as he certainly has the capability and experience to be a lieutenant, compared to Cassio who is all about books. He believed that Othello slept with Emilia. But then again, this is disputed because we know how manipulative Iago is and we simply do not know whether he intentionally made this up in his mind so that he has an excuse to eliminate the Moor. His main objective was to cast aside Cassio but in the process, he eliminated so many more people in the way.

Cassio lamenting about the importance of reputation to Iago.

And Iago is so much smarter than Othello. He is by far, the smartest character in the play, second to none. (Perhaps Emilia could come close but her sudden revelation was too late to aid the situation.) But Iago's strategy seem almost plausible at some points. Firstly, I think that it was pure luck that Emilia obtained the handkerchief. It is not everyday that Desdemona drops/loses her handkerchief without noticing it. (It was in fact, Othello who dropped it.) When the handkerchief is dropped, Emilia suddenly tells us that Iago has often told her to steal the handkerchief for Emilia and she wanted to please him. Since Emilia knows that Desdemona prizes the handkerchief so much, why did she hand it to her husband first (for she certainly knows that Iago is definitely up to no good) instead of giving it back to Desdemona? Why is she craving for Iago's love and attention when she is so cryptical about men? And don't Othello know that he was the one who refused and dropped Desdemona's strawberry handkerchief that day? Secondly, Roderigo should know something is amiss when Desdemona paid no attention to him whatsoever eventhough Iago promised to help him. And when Roderigo finally got to his senses and decided to confront Iago, Iago puts Roderigo into action to kill Cassio. Roderigo's in the middle of shouting at Iago and then when Iago suddenly instructs him to kill Cassio, without any justifications, Roderigo agreed and went off. It also seems a little ludicrous (in today's context at least) to kill one's wife when Othello isn't even definitely sure that Desdemona cheated on him.

Lastly, why is this play called Othello when Iago is the mastermind behind this whole play? And what happens to Iago? Eventhough Lodorico promises that Iago would be dealt with accordingly (obviously to be prosecuted) but no more is revealed about Iago. That is upsetting because I would definitely what would happen to Iago after all the he has done.

But at the end of the day, I think Iago is still the winner eventhough his deeds were revealed anyway because he had mostly achieved what he wanted to. Othello is dead, Cassio is wounded, useless Roderigo and his rookies Desdemona and Emilia are all dead.

Jealous Othello.

Jealousy can be very viscous and dangerous- that's the message of this play. When I first read the first few acts, I was under the impression that Othello would be all about Race and Racism as there were many derogatory terms such as Moor and black when referring to Othello. But after reading all 5 acts, I can thus conclude that Othello is a powerful play about jealousy, manipulation, deception and murder.

Othello Act 1-2

1. My opinions on the main characters.

Iago is very clever. As dangerous and as evil his plans are, I really like his character. He is also very racist as he refers to Othello as the 'black Moor' and anti-feminist as well. This is revealed through his conversation with Desdemona on how an ideal woman should be like. But he is highly skilled in manipulation tactics. He first did so with Roderigo, taking advantage of his undying love and affection for Desdemona, who was already Othello's wife. Iago used Roderigo to get things done, to provoke Cassio, to raise the alarm et cetra. And Cassio just falls into his trap perfectly. When all the damage is done, Iago deteriorated the situation by adding insult to the injury when telling Otello what had happened between Cassio and Montano. But he did so in such a discreet way that Cassio didn't even know that his career was just destroyed and teared apart by Iago. While Iago gave him advice for him to redeem himself (but actually just setting Cassio up for yet another downfall), Cassio whole-heartedly sought his advice and even thanked him. As he is the only character that directly addresses the audience, so he is a very appealing character to me.

Othello is somewhat the protagonist. In Act 1, he is noble and highly respected leader. His confidence and calmness were seen during the confrontation scene when Desdemona's father accused him of wooing her daughter with witchcraft. He also got his priorities right, which was to focus at the task at hand, to defeat the Turks at Cyprus. He seemed somewhat flawless in Act 1: a brave general, a loving husband, a peace-maker which made me feel as though he is rather fake and unbelievable. But his ratings drooped a little (for me at least) when he dismissed Cassio after listening to Iago's highly crafted speech. Cassio did not even have the chance to explain (but anyway he was too drunk). But then again, I cannot blame him for dismissing Cassio for Iago's just too clever. And then, it can be evidently seen in Act 2 that Othello is rather a soapy fellow to Desdemona. Too soapy, in my opinion, considering the fact that all the other male characters were anti-feminist. Desdemona is indeed the captain's captain.

I respected Cassio, I really did. Although his character was insulted right at the beginning of the play, I still found him a great character for he is a responsible lieutenant. Despite being insulted by Iago about his well-to-do family background a reason for his promotion to a lieutenant, I was under the impression that Cassio was a trustworthy and dependable character. However, I found his over the top apple-polishing a little annoying as he went on and on with the flattery which sounded like a broken tape recorder to me, just like Roderigo's whines. He also gave in to Iago's persuasion very easily for if he never drank, he wouldn't have fell into Iago's trap. But what done is done, for Iago is indeed a very persuasive character.

The one that has my sympathy is the poor Roderigo. Having failed to get Desdemona, he is being severely exploited by Iago with his schemes. And Roderigo, the poor fellow, is playing his part exactly like how Iago directed him to. Iago is the director, while Roderigo is the actor. Or you can say Iago is the puppet master and so forth.


2. My thoughts on the storyline.
So far, the storyline has been pleasant and fast-paced. From Act 1 to 2, Iago's great evil schemes begin to unravel and it enlightens me a lot about the fact that I know all about Iago's plans. The most clever part of the storyline is that the audience are actually one of the characters of the play as well so it makes readers, like me feel involved. And Shakespeare, or rather Iago, does not treat us, readers completely stupid people. Iago challenges and convinces us that he is not exactly a villain and tries to justify it. Here, Iago also tries to manipulate us, the readers. And the fact that we know all about Iago's schemes makes readers on par with Iago, in other words, as smart as Iago, makes us feel very good, for we are respected and also are as intelligent as Iago. The storyline up to Act 2 is simple enough but I have this feeling that the plot is about to get more exciting and more complex as it progresses through Acts 3 to 5.